Current Issue

Chapter News
Features
Viewpoints
Student Views
From the Editor's Desk
Message from the President
Reviews
Society Notes & Community Announcements




 Article Archives 

Book Review
Career Development
Case Studies
Content Management
Contracting & Consulting
Core Competencies
Meeting Reviews
Usability
Networking
Online Help & Embedded Assistance
Technologies
Translation and Localization
Up and Coming Corner
Information Architecture


 Past Issues 

May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
December, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
November, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006

How not to look for work

Share on Facebook :: Printer Friendly Version

—by Rob Hughes

Published: February 2006 in Meeting Reviews

The mistakes fall into two main categories — carelessness in presenting your application and failing to address the requirements of the job.

Imagine you’re hiring a new writer for your department. You’ve whittled the stack of resumes down to two excellent candidates. Each applicant’s experience is ideal for the job, and the skill sets are nearly identical. In a final attempt to find something that’ll tip the balance in one applicant’s favour, you scan their resumes again. That’s when you notice their email addresses. The first candidate can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). The other candidate chose .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) as her handle. Which person would you rather work alongside?

This scenario came to mind during the highly entertaining and enlightening January chapter meeting, where Jack Molisani of ProSpring Inc. presented the Top 10 Mistakes Writers Make When Looking For Work. The mistakes fall into two main categories — carelessness in presenting your application and failing to address the requirements of the job. (For the complete list, visit the Resources page at http://www.prospring.net.)

Don’t get sloppy

Ensure your resume reflects the best practices of your profession. If you must submit your application in Word, turn track changes off, and look at the hidden characters to ensure you haven’t created a dog’s breakfast of manual formatting (because the recruiter, rest assured, will check). Name the file using your first and last name — calling it “resume.doc” almost guarantees that your painstakingly compiled two pages will be lost in the shuffle. Lastly, proofread, proofread, and then proofread again. A typo in a job application is the kiss of death.

Tailor the application to the job

If your perfectly formatted and proofread application reaches the right person, what else might go wrong? The skills summary in your resume or cover letter might not correspond directly to the job requirements as written. You might not have highlighted your strengths by placing the most relevant information near the top of your cover letter. You may have neglected to address questions a recruiter might have right off the top — questions about gaps in your work history, or why you’re seeking a permanent position after working for years as a contract writer.

If there was an over-arching theme to Jack’s advice, it was “help recruiters do their jobs.” When you make their lives easier, your application has a much better shot at rising to the top of the slush pile.

Rob Hughes, a former editor of Coast lines, probably wasn’t the only person who left this meeting with a fresh set of New Year’s resolutions. He works at Xantrex Technology in Burnaby.

Previous: That’s a good question!

Next: A little project management goes a long way


 Subscribe via RSS

Visit the main STC website.

STC advances the theory and practice of technical communication across all user abilities and all media.


STC-related links

Note: You may need to be logged into these services to view the pages.

©2012 STC CWC | Home | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)